From Our Clients

"Our website has multiplied in traffic since Jules worked his magic. A worthwhile investment indeed! I can highly recommend SEO.co.nz"
- Matt Baker


"Thanks for your work, we have been on the front page in Auckland and we have taken about 6 wedding bookings since. It really does work for us"
- Steve May


"I was impressed by the contact that was maintained throughout the whole process, and the final result was done before the agreed deadline. I’m one very happy customer!"
- Jason


"Jules was prompt and friendly, and the info he provided played a key role in shaping my business. Thanks for the great service"
- Sebastian G

Read more...

  • 02Sep
    A working man works till the industry dies

    An Abandoned Racetrack in Illinois

    Some industries and businesses collapse because of a fundamental change in the market. Newspapers and payphones are becoming less relevant, so are video stores and bowling alleys. These represent the classic example of technology changing market demand, causing some existing and even entrenched industries to collapse.

    But I think a lot of markets have failed or are beginning to fail simply because they aren’t doing anything new. As previous supporters die out, nobody steps in to fill their shoes.

    One example of this is the racing industry, and specifically harness racing and greyhound racing.

    For a time technology was racing’s savior. The introduction of simulcasting of race meetings meant punters could bet on any race they wanted to from the comfort of their own home – which caused handle and purses to shoot up.

    The problem with this approach is that the people missed out on the thrill of the sport. That’s what you experience when you’re at the track with money on a horse coming down the home stretch, your heart pumping wildly as you slap the racetrack fence with your copy of best bets. Now, watching from home is fine with the existing customer base, they’re already hooked on the sport. But try turning the to the racing channel when you’re with someone who is indifferent to the sport and see how long it takes them to complain.

    For most people horse racing is at best boring, at worst cruel, and generally agreed to be completely irrelevant nowadays. It’s space in newspapers has been steadily decreasing for decades, and the industry is currently facing what it calls a ‘wagering crisis’. Even die-hard fans are leaving the sport as Racetracks and Government try to milk a shrinking wagering dollar.

    So what happened? Ask any horsemen and they’ll give you a diverse mixture of accusations. But I think that basically the public stopped caring. In New Zealand racing took off because a while back it was the only place you could drink after 6pm. This created long term fans some of which have still stuck around, but they won’t last forever.

    The thing is that nothing has changed in the industry for years. There’s nothing particularly exceptional about it for media to talk about.

    Parallel this to emerging web start ups:

    Most people would agree that invoicing is about as thrilling as watching a bunch of horses go round a track, but have a look at the attention some of the emerging online invoicing startups are getting.  Companies like Blinksale (which I use for all my invoicing), regularly receive mainstream media and online attention, far more than their size should dictate.

    The difference is that what they’re doing is new and innovative. There’s actually something there to report on, as opposed to horse racing which is stagnant.

    Can anything be done about it? For the most part I don’t think there is any simple answer, at least not without big industry behind it. NASCAR  is unfathomably boring for the New Zealander’s, but they somehow found make cars going round in circles relevant to the everyday American.

    The newspaper industry is the oft-cited example of a dying industry because it took them too long to realise their primary purpose had shifted from a news source to a news filter. Over the past decade newspapers faced with falling subscription revenue folded to the advertising pressure and released their content free online. The Financial Times managed to survive with it’s “Pay Wall” intact because it realized that people don’t mind paying for quality if it saves them time:

    “It was pretty lonely out there for a while in paid land,” he said last week. “But it has become pretty clear that advertising alone is not going to sustain online business models. Quality journalism has to be paid for.”

    The growth of paid online services under the Financial Times banner shows that the paper was right to maintain pay walls at a time when other media companies were yielding to the Silicon Valley mantra that “information wants to be free,” said Tim Luckhurst, a journalism professor at the University of Kent in Britain and a former editor of The Scotsman.

    “It has proved, in one niche at least, that editorial journalistic endeavor does create value,” he said.

    NY Times

    I guess in sum, there are no clear cut solutions. But there’s more than one way to skin a cat, and doing nothing is the worst option.

  • 26Nov

    Sometimes SEO is too easy.

    Here are the traffic stats from a newly launched horse racing blog:

    Traffic from Google around Melbourne Cup day

    Why the increase? All I did was wait until the big Melbourne Cup race was over, wait for it to appear on YouTube (about 100 refreshes ;) ) and then I had the video posted within about 30 minutes.

    The key was having the title and a little bit of content optimized around the phrase “Melbourne Cup replay.”

    Here are the actual Keywords people were searching for to find the post:

    Melbourne Cup Keyword Stats

    My theory was that right after the race people would be searching for the most recent Melbourne Cup, but because it was so recent no authoritative websites would have the content up that quick – so Google would be ranking the outdated stuff. I through in the “2008″ to pick up some more searches as people refined their searches by using “2008″.

    The blog wasn’t too closely related to the Melbourne Cup – but close enough so that regular readers wouldn’t feel the post was out of place.

    In any niche there are big events that can be exploited like this. And if you don’t have much to say on the subject, a YouTube video is the easiest content you can get.

  • 06Nov

    The NZ elections are coming up on Saturday the 8th of November, and while both major campaigns are marketing themselves fairly well offline, their online search engine optimisation strategies leave a little to be desired.

    This post takes a quick look at the Labour and National Party’s websites.

    Robots.txt

    The robots.txt file is usually my first port of call when undertaking a website’s SEO. This is the file where the webmaster (or SEO) can dictate what the search engines can see, and what they can’t on any website.

    Unfortunately, neither Labour nor National have seem to have heard of a robots.txt file:

    National offers all their policies in HTML and PDF format. By not disallowing these PDFs, they’re splitting up their link juice, as some external sites will link to the two different pages. Adding the PDF’s to robots.txt is a clear indication to search engines that the HTML version of the page is the one they should rank. National should also put the nofollow tag on each internal link to these PDF.

    Authority

    Sitelinks are a clear sign that Google thinks a website is authoritative in it’s niche. Labour has them for the keyphrase “labour party,” but also for the more ambiguous keyword “labour.”

    A Google search for "labour" brings up these

    National on the other hand, gets no such love. One reason for this is that the sitelink algorithm favours an exact match on the title tag. By putting “NZ” in front of the keyphrase “National Party” they’re diluting the exact matches effect.

    A Google search for "national party" brings up this

    Backlinks

    Labour’s website shows a total of 558 backlinks according to Yahoo’s Site Explorer. National shows 12,100. Here’s where Labour really messes up. They have redirected www.labour.co.nz, and www.labour.org.nz using a non search engine friendly 302 temporary redirect instead of the search engine friendly 301 permanent redirect. Not only that but going to http://labour.co.nz (without the www) gives a big “Bad Request (Invalid Hostname).” These failed redirections are likely the reason the Labour Party website shows so few backlinks.

    Both sites offer some relatively good content to link at, such as tax calculators, but there has clearly been no concise strategy to develop links. They could do a lot better with conversational content… how about a quiz called “Are you a National or Labour voter?”

    Title Tags

    National has pretty straightforward title tags, generally opting for “$page name – NZ National Party.”

    But again Labour is making some serious SEO errors. All of Labour’s policy pages – the main topics people will be searching for when deciding how to vote – have the exact same title tag for every page within the that section.

    Next to backlinks, title tags are the most important things search engines look at when deciding where to rank a page.

    Final Thoughts

    I could go on as there are a few more minor issues that should be given some attention, but judging from the analysis so far the effort would be largley accademic. Both the Labour and National party have some serious SEO problems that could be fixed very easily by a knowledgeable person.

    Political bloggers are saying that the internet has only played a minor role in this years election. But if the political spectrum in the US is anything to go by, getting it right is going to be far more important in the years to come.

  • 18Sep

    As this is the first post on this blog, I though I’d let everyone know what’s happening with this website and what to expect in the future.

    The site’s coming along nicely and is nearing completion – a few more pages need some content but in terms of front end functionality this is about it.

    It’s is running on WordPress, with the blog in separate part of the site. While out of the box WordPress is set up to be a blogging platform, the system and community are so great you can basically set it up to do whatever you want. Even Ford’s official site runs on WordPress.

    The logo design was an interesting experience. I ran a competition at 99 designs and the eventual winner, Sima, turned out to be not only a great designer but a very patient person to work with.

    Once the site’s finished I’m looking forward to posting some interesting stuff on this blog. I’ll try to cut out the fluff, and I’ll write about what I’ve been learning in the SEO/Online Marketing field.

    Along that vein, expect to see:

    • Info on how to configure WordPress to function as a website
    • Some Black Hat stuff (which I’ve recently been experienting with on some of my own projects)
    • Extensive information on SEO for large websites (10,000 pages+). (I’ve been doing SEO for a long time for a website with 65,000 pages at last count.)
    • And all the usual SEO/PPC stuff

    That’s it for now, I probably won’t update this blog for a little while until I’m happy with content and functionality of this website, but since this websites starting to see a fair amount of traffic I thought I’d write a quick update on where it’s all going.

   Next Entries »

Recent Comments

  • Yeah but unfortunately some other late to the party blogger'...
  • Ha - I see you are no.3 for this now :) Yeah it was down ...
  • Haha cheers for the keyword stuff, you could have wrapped it...
  • Haha Jules...cheeky I love it. Pretty confident you will...
  • http://www.digg.com...